Ranking electoral systems through hierarchical properties ranking
نویسنده
چکیده
Electoral systems are complex entities composed of a set of phases that form a process to which performance parameters can be associated. One of the key points of every electoral system is represented by the electoral formula that can be characterized by a wide spectrum of properties that, according to Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem and other theoretical results, cannot be all satisfied at the same time. Starting from these basic results the aim of the paper is to examine such properties within a hierarchical framework, based on Analytic Hierarchy Process proposed by T. L. Saaty ([Saa80]), performing pairwise comparisons at various levels of a hierarchy so to get a global ranking of such properties. Since any real electoral system is known to satisfy some of such properties but not others it should be possible, in this way, to get a ranking of the electoral systems according also to the political goals both of the voters and the candidates. In this way it should be possible to estimate the relative importance of each property with respect to the final ranking of every electoral formula.
منابع مشابه
Using a hierarchical properties ranking with AHP for the ranking of electoral systems
Electoral systems are complex entities composed of a set of phases that form a process to which performance parameters can be associated. One of the key points of every electoral system is represented by the electoral formula that can be characterized by a wide spectrum of properties that, according to Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem and other theoretical results, cannot be all satisfied at the s...
متن کاملHierarchical Group Compromise Ranking Methodology Based on Euclidean–Hausdorff Distance Measure Under Uncertainty: An Application to Facility Location Selection Problem
Proposing a hierarchical group compromise method can be regarded as a one of major multi-attributes decision-making tool that can be introduced to rank the possible alternatives among conflict criteria. Decision makers’ (DMs’) judgments are considered as imprecise or fuzzy in complex and hesitant situations. In the group decision making, an aggregation of DMs’ judgments and fuzzy group compromi...
متن کاملLearning Mixtures of Ranking Models
Probabilistic modeling of ranking data is an extensively studied problem with applications ranging from understanding user preferences in electoral systems and social choice theory, to more modern learning tasks in online web search, crowd-sourcing and recommendation systems. This work concerns learning the Mallows model – one of the most popular probabilistic models for analyzing ranking data....
متن کاملUniversity Ranking Systems – From League Table to Homogeneous Groups of Universities
The paper contains a review of the literature in terms of the critical analysis of methodologies of university ranking systems. Furthermore, the initiatives supported by the European Commission (U-Map, U-Multirank) and CHE Ranking are described. Special attention is paid to the tendencies in the development of ranking systems. According to the author, the ranking organizations should abandon th...
متن کاملCREDIBILITY THEORY ORIENTED PREFERENCE INDEX FOR RANKING FUZZY NUMBERS
This paper suggests a novel approach for ranking the most applicable fuzzy numbers, i.e. $LR$-fuzzy numbers. Applying the $alpha$-optimistic values of a fuzzy number, a preference criterion is proposed for ranking fuzzy numbers using the Credibility index. The main properties of the proposed preference criterion are also studied. Moreover, the proposed method is applied for ranking fuzz...
متن کامل